Posted 5 days ago

Survey

tabby-flenderson:

Excuse me, guys! I was wondering if people of any Mbti type would reblog this with three words to describe yourself. Ex: ENTP, brave, spontaneous, clumsy.

ENFP, Moody, Lazy and Spontaneous.

Posted 3 weeks ago
I can’t go on. I can’t go another day without seeing you. I love you furiously […]
Auguste Rodin, from a letter to Camille Claudel (via violentwavesofemotion)
Posted 3 weeks ago
Posted 4 weeks ago

Love

Sometimes when you aren’t looking in class I look at you and wonder how can such a perfect person love me. I am so full of imperfection and you are so perfect in every way. When you smile, when you laugh, when you are silent, in each and every way you are perfect and beautiful. I feel so much that it feels really weird for me to write about it. I feel embarrassed as if it is some sort of sin to love some one so much and so deeply. What a great sin indeed to love someone so much.
You ask me at times, why do I love you so much. I ask you why shouldn’t I love you so much? What is not to love in you? Where do I even start from? Should I start from your smile? Or your dimples? Or your eyes? Or the way you talk? Your silent stare? Or when you get all emotional and sentimental? Or when you become a stubborn fool?
I have never fought with someone as much as I did with you and i have never loved someone as much I loved you. Though the fights made me depressed and sad at times, too many times they made me cry in frustration but at the same time those songs that you sent, those lyrics that you found and the little things that you did like drawing that Y.Askim, those gifts that you gave me on my birthday they made me immensely happy. So happy that I don’t know how to hide my smile and at times I wondered if it was possible to be this happy.
I don’t want to think about the end. But like all stories, there has to be an ending. Ours is a sad ending but our story isn’t sad. You will be in my heart and my thoughts for years to come. And when I’ll mix with sand like all living things must do, your thoughts will be transferred along with all my memories to that sand and to all those things that will grow from it. :)

Posted 4 weeks ago

Eventually, everything connects. I’m a firm believer in fate. It’s a big world we live in, and we pass by thousands of people in our lifetime who we never get the chance to meet. But the ones we do happen to lock eyes or share a handshake with, all add a little something to the puzzle. For some it may be only a small piece, and some might end up completing it.

It could take a while for the full picture to reveal itself, but eventually, everything comes to light, and everything works out just the way it’s supposed to.

Posted 1 month ago

I did not ask to be born—did not will myself into being—
did not shape myself of egg and sperm. I am not the God
you claim created me. I am not the God you prayed to
for a daughter. I did not ask for life, did not ask to be pushed
beyond the void of the womb and into your arms. Did not ask
to be fed or sheltered or educated—
I did not ask for life

but you gave it to me. Mom told me you prayed for a daughter,
wanted me more than you’d wanted anything. A daughter—you prayed
and prayed and prayed to the God you believe in. ‘Please, give me
a daughter.’

4 children lost in the ocean of my mother’s womb—
I was your miracle. Words like high-risk hung heavy
in the air—2 shots a week… just to keep me alive. I
was your miracle when your son, my brother,
was born dead, your miracle, when 3 children
never saw the light of day. Your miracle…
a baby girl—

But I felt like a curse. Your voice, uttering the words
‘You were the biggest mistake I ever made’, over and over again.
‘I wish you were never born. This is your fault. All your fault.
Look what you made me do’, when you hit me or made an error
in your paperwork. The soundtrack of my childhood
is filled with your voice, assigning blame, until I believed
I was the source of everything that had ever gone wrong
in our lives, until I believed that you would be happier,
better off—without me—

When you weren’t looking, I burned my legs with matches
from the box above the sink. Poured hot wax on my arms,
placed my hand on the kitchen burner, hot from cooking
grilled cheese or soup. I cut my legs in the bathtub, fantasized
about the million different ways in which I might kill myself
so the world could finally be rid of me. I imagined my legs,
breaking as I fell from the top of a building downtown, the sound
of my ribs, cracking and my breath escaping like the air from
a balloon. My neck, limp and broken from a noose. I looked up
lethal doses of drugs on the internet, researched how to get downtown,
wondered how long it would take for an overdose to kill me
or where I could get a gun.

When you heard me crying in my room,
when you yelled at me to stop and threatened me,
I learned to hide my scars from you, learned to pretend
that things were okay when they weren’t. I cried when you
were at work, when you were asleep, learned to make it quiet,
learned to lie because if I told the truth I was met with threats—
and your screams, ‘Look at what I’ve provided for you, you ungrateful
spoiled brat!’

When you wonder why I remain quiet. Why I lie to you. Why
you don’t know the things that my mother does. Why I don’t
come to you with my problems. Why I avoid you when I speak
to her. Remember that tonight when I told you the truth,
when I came to you with an honest answer, that your response
was to threaten me—’I won’t let you see your grandma’—and to blame
me, when I called you out on it.

When you wonder why… a poem about my relationship with my father. K.L.R. (talesfromthewater)

Loved this!!

Posted 1 month ago

When my husband [Carl Sagan] died, because he was so famous and known for not being a believer, many people would come up to me — it still sometimes happens — and ask me if Carl changed at the end and converted to a belief in an afterlife. They also frequently ask me if I think I will see him again.

Carl faced his death with unflagging courage and never sought refuge in illusions. The tragedy was that we knew we would never see each other again. I don’t ever expect to be reunited with Carl. But, the great thing is that when we were together, for nearly twenty years, we lived with a vivid appreciation of how brief and precious life is. We never trivialized the meaning of death by pretending it was anything other than a final parting. Every single moment that we were alive and we were together was miraculous — not miraculous in the sense of inexplicable or supernatural. We knew we were beneficiaries of chance… That pure chance could be so generous and so kind… That we could find each other, as Carl wrote so beautifully in Cosmos, you know, in the vastness of space and the immensity of time… That we could be together for twenty years. That is something which sustains me and it’s much more meaningful.

The way he treated me and the way I treated him, the way we took care of each other and our family, while he lived. That is so much more important than the idea I will see him someday. I don’t think I’ll ever see Carl again. But I saw him. We saw each other. We found each other in the cosmos, and that was wonderful.

Ann Druyan (via whats-out-there)
Posted 1 month ago

15-Year-Old African Kid Tells Madonna To Go ‘Have Sex’ with Herself

lostintrafficlights:

deliciouskaek:

almightykushlord:

Dakarai Molokomme, a 15-year-old starving child from a small village in Zimbabwe, has just told , one of the most famous pop stars in the world, to  and f*** , the local media are reporting exclusively.

“Yes, it’s true, I told Madonna to go f*** herself. Do you want to know why?” Dakarai asked. “It’s the same thing every time with these snobby rich Americans. Every once in a while they come to show us their support for the so-called eradication of poverty by adopting a child from a starving family, but they actually do more harm than good. Transracial international adoptions are part of the white savior industrial complex,” Dakarai explained.

In further discussions with journalists from the media, the  stated that “none of the children here actually want to be taken away from their family and friends so they can be displayed as some kind of trophy in the homes of self-righteous singers or actors who want to score some points with the media and Oprah.”

“If they really want to help us, they should get Big Pharma to ship us some anti-retroviral drugs for the AIDS epidemic, or build schools and hospitals. If they don’t want to do that, then they can all go f** themselves!” the child told reporters.

The 15-year-old also stated that he would say the same thing to any one of those American or European “faux humanitarian posers”, except for Bono, whom he said he would also kick in the groin.

“Bono’s efforts to save the African savage from itself prove that the colonial imperative is alive and well,” Dakarai said as he walked with other village children collecting sticks to build a tree fort.

THIS IS THE RAWEST 15 YEAR OLD ALIVE

but this isn’t true though :c

Shit really? :(

Posted 1 month ago

Pro-infanticide lunacy on display

fightforhumanity1:

princessfknpeach:

fightforhumanity1:

princessfknpeach:

fightforhumanity1:

princessfknpeach:

fightforhumanity1:

princessfknpeach:

Actually, I do realize it’s from China. I can read. 

It doesn’t matter how many other people can donate, even if you are the only one on earth, your bodily autonomy would still be upheld. In this specific case, where were the thousands that could be a donor? Just asking because you seem so sure.

Whether or not the person in question is at fault for the second party’s need for an organ is irrelevant. If not, prove me wrong. Link me to an incident where someone caused someone to need an organ and was used as an unwilling donor as a result. 

Ok ,  well  I am not  well  versed  on  Chinese law,  but  I don’t  think  bodily  autonomy  is  the  same  in  china  like it is  in  the USA.

Yeah, I’m pretty sure our citizen’s bodily autonomy is more protected, if you consider the forced abortions and sterilization going on over there.

That is  a  extremely  unlikely situation.  Even if  that  happen  bodily  autonomy   is  different  in  each  country. If that  one person lives  in  north korea  they  could be forced  by  their   country  to   donate.

lol source?

Your  donor   can  come  from  any  country around  the  world.   So the  amount  of  people   that   can  donate  is  relevant .  While  you  can’t  force   somebody  to  give up  their organs ,  There  are  technically  over  7 billion  people  that  can  donate.  Of course  if you  take  out  the people  that  are  not  your  blood type  and  children  you  still  have  several hundred million  people   that  can  donate  to you.  The  amount of  people   that  can  donate  is  completely  relevant. 

Where are you even going with this? The reason I said it didn’t matter how many people can donate is because the person above tried to say it’s a false equivalence because many people can donate. Even if you’re the only one who can, which happens quite often due to time constraints, you don’t have to donate your organs or bodily resources.

It  is  not about  weather  the person  is  at  fault.  Abortion  creates  a person   and  kills  that same person.  That  would  be  like  some one  saying  they  want to  donate their  organ to   a  sick person  then  regretting  their decision   and  killing  the  sick person.

… No? It wouldn’t? Not even close? This makes no sense at all.

Also  I don’t  think  that  situation  exist or  is  rare  in  existance  because if  we  were  to  do that  most  people  that would  be  forced  would  die   since  most  organs  that  are  donanted  are  organs  that  a  person  can’t  survive. Forcing   people  to   donate  while  alive  would  kill  a bunch of  people  to   save  others. 

Actually, kidneys are the most widespread organ transplant in the world. And as we all know, you can live with one kidney. So no.

Basically  The another  reason  force  donation is   not  legal  because there  are  a lot  of  people  in  need  of  organs   that   one  can’t  survive  without. Forcing  people  to  donate  would  kill  a  significant  amount  of  people so others  would  survive. To  force  people  donate  you  would  have  to  actively  kill people,  volunteer  organ  donation  people  die  because  of  nature.

Like I said before, the most common organ needed is the kidney, and we can live with only one. Why, then, aren’t we forced to donate our kidneys?

Abortion actively  kills  a  person  for  no  reason  other  than  convenience ( on demand  abortion). The  unborn  doesn’t  die  in  abortion  because  of  natural  causes.  In  abortion  a  women  pays  a   person  to  kill  and  dismember , or  poison   the  unborn. 

Pretending for a second like this is as simple as you put it, and people only abort for “”“”convenience”“”“, so the fuck what? It’s their body. Any reason to not want someone else to use it is good enough. They don’t have to justify shit to you.

Yeah, I’m pretty sure our citizen’s bodily autonomy is more protected, if you consider the forced abortions and sterilization going on over there.

Assuming  by  our  citizen’s , you mean  USA,  and  over there  as  in China ; you  can’t   use  a  Chinese article   to  prove  the state  of  bodily  autonomy  in  the  USA . 

I’m not using a Chinese article to prove anything but that people have denied their children their bodily resources and didn’t face any consequences because you guys keep saying that people are required to care for their children no matter the cost. If you think it’d be different in the US, you’re welcome to try and prove that.

lol source?

What  do you  need  a  source on.  That  one  person  being  the  only  possible  person  that  can  donate is  very  unlikely;  That  north  korea is lacking  in  rights  and  technically  force  its  citizen’s to  do  anything; or  that  not  every  country   in  the  world   is  a  free  country like  the  USA and  doesn’t  have  bodily  autonomy  laws  like  US.

You said the North Korea thing like there was a specific situation where this happened. Nevermind.

Where are you even going with this? The reason I said it didn’t matter how many people can donate is because the person above tried to say it’s a false equivalence because many people can donate. Even if you’re the only one who can, which happens quite often due to time constraints, you don’t have to donate your organs or bodily resources.

No, the  trouble  with  organ  donation  today  is  not  that  there  aren’t  enough  people who can to  donate , it is  that  there  are  not  enough  people  who  do  donate there  are many  people  who  can  donate, but  many  don’t .  Not  because  of  not  wanting  to, but  because of neglecting to do so. The  problem is  that  there  are  more  in need  of  organs, than  there  are  organ  detonators.. But , any  healthy  individual  can  donate. Also,  it  is  the sick  person’s  responsibility  to  find  a  person  who  is  willing  to  donate ,  but  most people  join  organizations  that  do  that  for them, but  they have  a  waiting  list  and most  people   die  waiting .  since  it  goes  by  most  in  need  and  other  factors. 

I never said the problem with organ donation was that there aren’t enough people. I said the problem was time. You can have all the people on earth volunteer and that wouldn’t mean anything if you didn’t have time to test them all.

… No? It wouldn’t? Not even close? This makes no sense at all.

You yourself  just agreed  most  people  in  need  of  organs die  of  time  constraints  are you  saying  that  babies  that  are  aborted  die from time constraints too because  you  would  be  wrong. While most  people   in  need  of  organs  die  of  time constraints,  all babies  that  are  aborted  die  because they  are  actively  killed  by  the mother  or  an abortionist. 

No, that’s not what I’m saying. And what does it matter that fetuses are actively killed? Would it bother you less if they were left to die from exposure?

Actually, kidneys are the most widespread organ transplant in the world. And as we all know, you can live with one kidney. So no.

If you  mean  that  kidneys  are  the  most  donated  organ  yes. Since  one  can  survive  without  one  but there  is  a  significant amount  of  people  who  need  organ  such  as  a  heart   that  would  kill  a person  to  take by  force.

No, I mean what I said. Kidneys are the most widespread requested organ transplant. 

Like I said before, the most common organ needed is the kidney, and we can live with only one. Why, then, aren’t we forced to donate our kidneys?

Because   there  are  7 billion people  that  could possibly  donate  a  kidney. Patients  are  responsible  for  finding  their  donors  unless they  get put  on  a  waiting  list.  If  somebody  doesn’t  want to  sell  their  organs  There are  6,999,999,999 other  people  you  can  ask. Even  if you  separate  by  blood type ,  1% of  the  population is about  3 million people and most  blood  types between 40-4% of  the  population  even  the  rarest  blood  type  includes  at least 12 million  people   that  are  exact match  to your  blood types.  It  only gets  higher  when you  add  all the blood  type  you  could  be  compatible  with. For  a  baby  there  are  not  3 million  uteruses  it  can  be  transferred  to.

You’re dancing around the question. Are you really saying the only reason we don’t have forced kidney donation is because it is the sick person’s responsibility to find a donor, or are you going to admit that the right to life doesn’t trump bodily autonomy?

The literal amount of people who can donate to you don’t amount to shit if you can’t actually test them all, idk why you keep bringing this up.

Pretending for a second like this is as simple as you put it, and people only abort for “”“”convenience”“”“, so the fuck what? It’s their body. Any reason to not want someone else to use it is good enough. They don’t have to justify shit to you.

With  that  logic mothers  should  be able  to  neglect  their  born  children ,  and  nurses and  doctor  can  do  the  same  to their  patients.  But  you  probably  mean  physically  using your  body  right . Well  look  at it  this  way   a  women’s  actions  put  it  in  her  body  in  the  first  place,  a  unborn’s  survival  is dependent  on a  continuous supply  of  oxygen  and  nutrients from the  mother,  a  situation  it  was  forced  to  exist  in. There  is  no  alternative  to  another  host  for  the  baby  since if  cut off  for  any  amount  of  time  it  will die.  Keeping  in  mind  the  women  knew  that  this  would  be  the  situation  in  creating  this person ,  killing that  person is  depriving  it  of  the  right  to  live .

At least you quit bullshitting like being a nurse was in any way comparable to letting someone use your body for 9 months early in. Good for you. 

I’m side-eying the fact that you seem to only mention and blame the pregnant party so hard right now.

You also don’t know whether or not they knew that “this would be the situation” when they had sex. 

Even  if you  believe  no person should  be  able  to  use  your body  with out  consent  you  are not  allowed  to  kill  a person  as  a  refusal  for  consent  especially   if that  person  is  using  your  body  by  your  own  will .

Someone can’t be using your body by your own will if you revoked consent for them to be there. If killing them is the only way to revoke consent, then you are allowed to kill them. 

I’m not using a Chinese article to prove anything but that people have denied their children their bodily resources and didn’t face any consequences because you guys keep saying that people are required to care for their children no matter the cost. If you think it’d be different in the US, you’re welcome to try and prove that.

Ok , but  china  might  not  have  the  same  bodily  autonomy  laws  as the  US. Assuming  that  you  live  in  the  US  and the  defender-of-the-unborn is  from  the  US then proving  something  happens  outside  the us  is  irrelevant.  not  only  that  ,  but  china  is a  much  different  society  than  the  US. Using the  Chinese  article   proves  that  they  do  that  in  china  or  in  the  whole  world  there  are  people  that  can  do  that. But  it says  nothing  about  the US, which  seems to  be  the shared  country .  If you are  speaking  in  a  general  sense  outside  of  government  rule bodily  autonomy  doesn’t  apply in  a society  without  government  intervention. 

It’s like, the only documented case like it in the world. That’s why I linked it. 

You said the North Korea thing like there was a specific situation where this happened. Nevermind.

I was not  referring  to  any  specific  indecent,  but it  is  documented that they  do  force  their citizens  to  do  things against  their  will. 

I never said the problem with organ donation was that there aren’t enough people. I said the problem was time. You can have all the people on earth volunteer and that wouldn’t mean anything if you didn’t have time to test them all.

The  factor  of  time  is  heavily dependent  on  the  amount  of  people  actually   able  to  donate. The  time  is  a  factor  because  there are more  people  who  need  organs  than  there  are  available organs. If there  was  a  surplus,  time  would  not  be  a  factor. 

Yes, time would be a factor, because you’d have to test to find matches. Wtf?

No, that’s not what I’m saying. And what does it matter that fetuses are actively killed? Would it bother you less if they were left to die from exposure?

No,  It  would  bother  me  less if  we  didn’t  forcibly  kill or  forcibly have  these  unborn  individuals  die  for  other people convinces. 

So it doesn’t matter that they’re actively killed. 

No, I mean what I said. Kidneys are the most widespread requested organ transplant. 

ok then  , but  that  doesn’t  change  the  fact  that  forced  donation  would have  to  include  killing  people  so  that  they  can  donate  their  organs  that  they can’t  survive  without,  so  others  can  survive . 

Unless they only forced us to donate what we can survive without???

You’re dancing around the question. Are you really saying the only reason we don’t have forced kidney donation is because it is the sick person’s responsibility to find a donor, or are you going to admit that the right to life doesn’t trump bodily autonomy?

The literal amount of people who can donate to you don’t amount to shit if you can’t actually test them all, idk why you keep bringing this up.

The  right  to  life  doesn’t  equal  never  having  to  die, It  is  the  right  to not  being  killed  for  a  unjust reason.

lol abortion is arguably a just reason to kill tho

People  dying  because  of  disease or  illness  is  not  a  situation  where  a  right  to  life  applies.  Right  to  life  trumps  boidily  autonomy   in  some  situation. For  example drunk  driving, child neglect, public school  shots.  Plus if  one  doesn’t  have  right  to  life  they have  no  right  to  bodily  autonomy, because  with  out  the  right  to  life you   don’t  truly  control  what  happens  to  your  body. 

Maybe that’s why corpses have bodily autonomy, then.

It  is  not  a  matter of  testing  them  all  it is a  matter  of  testing  people  that  want  to  donate. Again  most people  do  not  donate  because  they  are nonchalant  about  doing  so. My  point  is  that  there  is  a  numerous  possible  donors . Testing them   is  not  a  problem.

Let me get this straight. You’re saying the reason we don’t have forced donation is because people won’t consent to being tested? What the fuck?

At least you quit bullshitting like being a nurse was in any way comparable to letting someone use your body for 9 months early in. Good for you. 

I’m side-eying the fact that you seem to only mention and blame the pregnant party so hard right now.

You also don’t know whether or not they knew that “this would be the situation” when they had sex. 

The pregnant  party  is  the  one  that is  responsible  for   creating   the  situation .  What  blame  could  be  put  unborn ? The  unborn  has  no  choice  in the  matter of  its  creation.

The fuck? Lol I guess humans reproduce asexually now!

Most  women  who  get  abortion   are  with  in  their  20s  or  close to  it. Plus ,  I  doubt  anyone  would  be  ignorant  of  the  fact  that  a  baby   is  the  result  of  vaginal  sexual  intercourse.

I’ve had people ask if they’re supposed to put their balls in a condom. Expect the unexpected.

 If they  don’t  know  where  babie  come  from  they  are  not  mature  enough to  have  sex.

Too bad that isn’t how it works though. Having sex in an of itself takes little to no maturity.

 Now   I am going  to  give you  the  benefit  of  the  doubt  and  assume you  are  speaking  of  the  odds  of  pregnancy  to   no pregnancy.  EVen  then they know  of  the  ending  results   and protection  doesn’t  negate the  fact  that  you  body  will  attempt  to  procreate.

So? Even if they consented initially, consent  can be revoked at any time.

Someone can’t be using your body by your own will if you revoked consent for them to be there. If killing them is the only way to revoke consent, then you are allowed to kill them. 

No you  are  not .  You  are not   allowed  to  kill your  boss if you  want  to  quit your  job ,  or  allowed  to  kill your  child if you  don’t  want  to  take  care  of  them .  Your  will  is  what  your  actions  are.  unborn  children   are   put  in   a  women’s  uterus  by  the  women’s  actions. Killing  them  for  no other  reason  other  than  convenience is  would  be  murder  in  any  other  case. 

Since when is killing your boss the only way to quit your job? Since when is killing a child the only way to give up custody of them? Come on now, this is starting to get painful. And you keep throwing around the term convenience like it matters. It doesn’t. Any reason to not want to share your body is a good reason.

It’s like, the only documented case like it in the world. That’s why I linked it. 

Unless  you  can  show  that  Chinese  bodily  autonomy  is  the  same  as  US  bodily  autonomy  it  has  no  relevance.

Yes, time would be a factor, because you’d have to test to find matches. Wtf?

the  problem  is not  testing  the  volunteers  it  is  finding  volunteers to  donate  that  is  the  time  factor. The  only  thing  they  really  need  to  test  for  is  blood type. They  can  find  that  out  easily .

So it doesn’t matter that they’re actively killed. 

Unless they only forced us to donate what we can survive without???

Still  not  a  right  to  life  case . A  individual  with  a  illness  has  no  right  to  force  a  healthy  individual  to  give  up t their organs. It  is  a  totally  different  situation than  abortion. Organ  donation  includes  a  person  who  got  a  disease  by nature , or  what  ever means, and a  donor  that  can  or  can  refuse  to  help. Abortion includes  a  person  that  was  made  by  the  will  of  another person  and  is  killed  by  the  creator  for  reason  of  inconvenience.

lol abortion is arguably a just reason to kill tho. 

No,  it is  not  if  abortion  was  a  just  reason  to  kill.  I  you  can’t  do  it  to  a  born  child  it  is  not  just . Even  though  a  born  child  is  not  inside  your  body  a  born  child  still  requires  a  physical  demand  on your  body . What  you  are  saying   is  that if you  force  a  person   in  a  position  of  dependence  on  you  it  is  ok  to kill  them  if  they  inconvenience you.

Maybe that’s why corpses have bodily autonomy, then.

corpes are the  bodies of  once l living  people, if  there  are  not  specific  instruction  of  what to  do  with the  body  after  death  then  it  is  asssume  that  the person  doesn’t  want  anything  done to  their  body  after  death. Same  reason  way  unconcious, coma patients, and  the  disable  also  have  bodily  autonomy.  Bodily  autonomy  is  the  protection  of  unwanted use   or protection  from  harm  of  the body  weather  the person  is  able  or  unable  to  voice  what  they  want  to  do  with their  body.

Let me get this straight. You’re saying the reason we don’t have forced donation is because people won’t consent to being tested? What the fuck?

The  reason  we  don’t  have  forced  donation  is  because  a  peson  in  need  of  a  organ  has no  right  to  force  someone  to  give  them  their  organs  just  because  they  are dying  of  natural  causes. A person  in  need  of  a  organ  does  not  have  the  right  to  violated  someone else to  stay  alive.  A unborn  has  a right to  life  because  the  unborn  was  force  into  its  situation. It  is  the  will  of  a  the mother  that  created  the  unborn  forcing  the  unborn  in  a position  of  dependence on the  mother   since  their  is  no  alternative  to   the  unborn  to  develop  in  another  environment the women  must let  unborn  live  .  Because  a  baby  has more  of  a  right  to  live  than  a  mother  has  a  right  to  be  inconvenienced. excluding  life thretening  senerios a  women   is  not  being  killed  or  harmed  by  the  baby . So  there for killing  the  baby  is  unjust.

The fuck? Lol I guess humans reproduce asexually now!

Way  to  not answer  the  question . Obviously  human  reproduction  includes  a man  and  a  women ,  but  it  is  a  women  who  controls  wheather  she  gets pregnant  or  not. So  again  what  blame  can  be put on  the  unborn  child.

I’ve had people ask if they’re supposed to put their balls in a condom. Expect the unexpected.

So, that  is not  the majority .  Most people  know the  result  of  having  vaginal  sex.

Too bad that isn’t how it works though. Having sex in an of itself takes little to no maturity.

The  pysichal  act  yes. But  people  who  don’t know  what  they  are  doing when  it  comes  to  sex  should  be  deterred from  having  it  until they  are  educated  about .  Even  if  some people  are ignorant  about  the  basics  of  sex  ,  it is not like  this  information  is  scarce .  The  vast majority , if not  all , people  have  access to  the  most  basic information of  sex. 

So? Even if they consented initially, consent  can be revoked at any time.

Killing  another  person  is not  revoking  consent. Plus if your  consent  is  harmful  to  another  person  then  consent  doesn’t  apply in  that  situation,  for  example drunk driving. 

Since when is killing your boss the only way to quit your job? Since when is killing a child the only way to give up custody of them? Come on now, this is starting to get painful. And you keep throwing around the term convenience like it matters. It doesn’t. Any reason to not want to share your body is a good reason.

I  never  said  these  are the  only  ways ,  I said  that  you  can’t  do  them. I  you  want  to  quit  your  job  killing your  boss  is  against  the law .  If you  don’t  want to  take  care of your  child ,  kill your  child is  against  the law. Abortion  is  killing  a  child  for  the  parents  convenience.

yes,  I am  using  convenience  because  the  top 3 reasons for  abortion are: interference with  other  life  goals ,  Not  feeling  adequate to  deal  with  a  child ,  and  financial  stability. Most  women  who  get  abortions  are  single  mothers  who  don’t want  to  be  single  moms . All of  these reason  are  reasons  that  fit  under  inconvenienced.

"Any reason to not want to share your body is a good reason.”

If you  don’t  want  to  share  your  body  don’t  put  a human  in  their  in  the  first  place. Also a  born  child  may not  be physically  in your  body , but  they  still uses it.  Do you think  that  parents  should  be  able  to  kill  their  children  for  any  reason ? because  any  reason  is  a good  reason. It  is  really not  about  the  sharing  of  the  body  , it  is  about  the  killing  of  the  human  being . 

Posted 1 month ago

dare-for-distances:

Thank you MTV for bringing acknowledgment to something that nobody else on the news will